On Rationality
About two months ago I started working for Stripe as a freelancer. I design for them 2
weeks a month, one week out of their SF
office, the other from my home in Belgium. It worked pretty well, but as an
iMac user, I had to use one of their Macs when working away from home. It
wasn't really comfortable. Sure, there's Dropbox, iCloud and more, but there
are an awful lot of tiny settings, custom development bundles, Fireworks
preferences, and so on you completely forget and really miss when you don't
have them. They kindly offered me to choose whatever new laptop I wanted to
make my workflow easier. It turns on that was a pretty tough decision.
I was obviously tempted by the MacBook Air, but it wasn't a reasonable
choice. I don't really need something incredibly thin and light, I just take
my laptop once a month to SF in my backpack and it's always plugged to an
external 27" the rest of the time (I use my iPad a lot). So, without any
hesitation, the MacBook Pro was a better choice. I mean, just compare the
specs:
- MacBook Air: Dual-core 1.8GHz, 4GB RAM
- MacBook Pro: Quad-core 2.5GHz, 8GB RAM
Kind of an obvious choice right? Well, I chose the MacBook Air. I knew it
wasn't a rational choice. Actually, it's a pretty stupid choice, but I
couldn't be happier to have followed my intuitions instead of a cold
analysis of the specs.
I suspect many people are acting like me. I think this "emotional spec" is
incredibly powerful, and it's the only spec that can't be written in a
comparison table. I think Apple understood that, and I guess it's one of—if
not the—reason the other companies fail miserably when trying to
clone Apple's products. I also guess that's why Apple is selling so well to
teenagers and non-tech savvy people: they don't compare CPU frequencies.